Financing available in Stores with Flexiti - Details
Product selection from
ZIPLOC
Ziploc Space Bag Assorted Plastic Storage Bags (6-Pack)
Article #01665254
Item #000433194
Model #031810704581
Format 6/PK
39
.
99
Each
This item is not currently available for immediate purchase, but can be ordered by visiting the selected store.
Hassle-Free Returns
90 days to return or exchange in original condition and packaging.
Read Return Policy
Description
- Ziploc Space Bags are airtight, waterproof, and reusable
- Up to 3 times the storage compared to uncompressed storage volume
Product specifications
Height(cm)
26.67
Height(in)
10.5
Height(mm)
266.7
Package Quantity
6
Sub-Brand
N/A
Thickness(Mils)
1
Type
Non-food storage
Unit of Measure
Quart(s)
Unit of Measure Quantity
1
Vacuum Seal
Yes
Width(cm)
14.9352
Width(in)
5.88
Width(mm)
149.352
Ziploc Space Bag Assorted Plastic Storage Bags (6-Pack) is rated
out of
5 by
16.
Rated 1 out of
5
by
NCW from
Terrible for travel - one use and they leak
Bought these to compress items for travel but the large sizes start leaking/inflating after one use. The smaller ones hold up a little better but not what I would have expected.
Date published: 2023-05-09
Rated 1 out of
5
by
Jim from
Not last
The larger sized ones all broke near the ziplock, despite only using 1-2x. Disappointed by the quality.
Date published: 2022-12-11
Rated 2 out of
5
by
ANI from
Seems there are product problems now.
Used product for years with no problem. Received for Christmas and nothing but problems. The large will not work, keep inflating. Have tried numerous times and let them sit. The medium seem to work find.
Date published: 2022-01-31
Rated 1 out of
5
by
Lisa from
Sadly, they re-inflate!
Doing some pandemic reorganization and got this 6 pack and a 4 count pack (2 jumbo 2 XL) to help store things better. Especially comforters and pillows. I put comforters in 2 of the XL bags and vacuumed out the air and put them in the closet. I could hear them hissing immediately. Letting the air back in. Tried again. Tried again. Followed the instructions exactly. Even got desperate and tried using an XL inside a jumbo. Nope. Ultimately they are entirely reinflated. Same with the large. Ziploc is a brand I use and trust forever so I opted for ziploc brand even though they were more expensive, just like I do with other products ... I thought it would be a good investment. It was really not. Really.
Date published: 2021-05-08
Rated 1 out of
5
by
Tim from
I am not happy about this purchase
I bought two of these 6 packs, the only ones that held good were the medium ones. The large and xtra large did not hold at all. I bought these to save space for traveling so did not benefit from these at all. I refused to buy more.
Date published: 2021-02-26
Rated 2 out of
5
by
CFC from
Not durabke
These are amazing for saving space while moving! I bought the brand name ziploc ones hoping for higher quality. They worked well, but do NOT last. I've been extremely careful using and storing these bags, but most of them have ripped near the zipper after just over a year of light use. Disappointed.
Date published: 2018-12-15
Rated 1 out of
5
by
Mark from
Terrible!
While these are great in theory, they are very low quality material. Every single bag I used either had a small rip in it or tiny holes that prevented it from keeping a seal. Every bag I used eventually re-expanded and were useless. I would never buy again.
Date published: 2017-12-20
Rated 2 out of
5
by
AmongTheUnimpressed from
Good when good, bad when bad
I bought the variety pack to keep my clothes safe in my storage unit while I traveled abroad. Most of the bags weren't airtight and when I got back they had expanded with air. The few that did hold air were great! Kept their shape, kept my clothes compressed and allowed me to store more per storage container. When I moved I unpacked the bags and tried storing winter clothes in these bags...second time around none of them worked. Not worth the money if they are only going to work once or not at all. I would have chalked that up to a faulty batch but it seems to be the consensus in these parts...
Date published: 2017-12-10